Herald of Civil Procedure
EN
main-photo

We in a citing index:

On Meaning of the Ius-Actio Paradigm and the Actio-Ius Paradigm for Forming Conditions of Derivative Actions Emergence

T.A. VASILEVA, 
Assistant of the Department of Civil Procedure of the Law Institute 
of the Siberian Federal University 

The article analyzes question on the meaning of conversion of the ius-actio paradigm on the actio-ius paradigm in English procedure for forming new remedy, including the derivative action. The author concludes that the activity of common law courts embodied the iusactio paradigm, emergence of the Chancery court and its further activity, including activity on affording of new remedies and means of protection, unknown to the common law, embodied the actio-ius paradigm. The emergence of the derivative action is comprehended in the context of notions «action», «the right of action», «the writ», «derivative rights». The article advocates the position that emergence of the derivative action became possible due to the current understanding of the claim, the relationship of the subjective right and action, emergence of derivative rights in common law. German doctrine studied process, which embodied the ius-actio paradigm, so the questions posed to the German doctrine was, above all, the need for understanding independence of procedure to the substantive law (the various concepts of action and right of action, the emergence of the claim (Anspruch) as an independent procedure category). The emergence of the derivative action was impossible not only due to socio-economic reasons, but also because of the unpreparedness of the procedural thought to understanding of this legal phenomenon in the German procedure. 

Keywords: civil procedure; arbitration procedure; derivative action; ius-actio; actio-ius; derivative rights.

References 

Argunov A.V. Pravovoe osnovanie spora vo frantsuzskom grazhdanskom protsesse [The Legal Basis of the Dispute in French Civil Procedure]. Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya = Herald of Economic Justice, 2015, no. 4. (In Russian) 
Baron Yu. Sistema rimskogo grazhdanskogo prava. V 6 kn. [The System of Modern Roman Law. In 6 books]. St. Petersburg, 2005. (In Russian) 
Chilarzh K.F. Uchebnik institutsii rimskogo prava [Textbook of Institutions of Roman Law]. Moscow, 1906. (In Russian) 
Dobrovol’skii A.A. Iskovaya forma zashchity prava (Osnovnye voprosy ucheniya ob iske) [The Action Form for Protection of Right (The Main Issues of the Doctrine on Action)]. Moscow, 1965. (In Russian) 
Duddigton J. Essentials of Equity and Trust Law. Worcester College of Technology, 2006. Dzhenks E. Angliiskoe pravo (Istochniki prava. Sudoustroistvo. Sudoproizvodstvo. Ugolovnoe pravo. Grazhdanskoe pravo) [English Law (Sources of Law. Organization of the Court System. Procedure. Criminal Law. Civil Law)]. Moscow, 1947. (In Russian) 
Shcheglov V.N. Isk o sudebnoi zashchite grazhdanskogo prava [The Action on Court Protection of Civil Right]. Tomsk, 1987. (In Russian) 
Sokolova N.V. Doveritel’naya sobstvennost’ (trast) v kontinental’noi Evrope [Trust in Continental Europe]. Moscow, 2012. (In Russian) 
Vutt M. Shareholder’s Derivative Claim – Does Estonian Company Law Require Modernisation? Juridica International, 2008, vol. 2.
Watson A. Roman Law and English Law: Two Patterns of Legal Development. Loyola Law Review, 1990, vol. 36, no. 2. 
Windscheid B. Die Actio des römishen Civilrechts, von Standpunkte des heutigen Rechts. Buddeus, 1856. 
Wooldridge F., Davies L. Derivative Claims under UK Company Law and Some Related Provisions of German Law. Amicus Curiae, 2012, vol. 90. 
Yablochkov T.M. Uchebnik russkogo grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva [Textbook of Russian Civil Proceedings]. Yaroslavl’, 1912. (In Russian) 
Yiannopoulos A.N. Real Actions in Louisiana and Corporative Law. Louisiana Law Review, 1965, vol. XXV, no. 3. 

Information about the author 

Vasileva T.A. (Krasnoyarsk, Russia) – Assistant of the Department of Civil Procedure of the Law Institute of the Siberian Federal University (660075, Krasnoyarsk, Maerchaka St., 6, room 2-05; e-mail: [email protected]). 

Recommended citation 

Vasileva T.A. O znachenii paradigmy ius-actio i actio-ius dlya formirovaniya uslovij vozniknoveniya kosvennogo iska [On Meaning of the Ius-Actio Paradigm and the Actio- Ius Paradigm for Forming Conditions of Derivative Actions Emergence]. Вестник гражданского процесса = Herald of Civil Procedure, 2017, no. 5, p. 170–184. (In Russian) DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2017-7-5-170-184

 el_.png   it_.png   book.png

T.A. Vasileva